The root you should consider is, "Am I Swiss or European?".
As painful as it sounds, Switzerland is a small country with a total population of only about 9 million people.
As the saying goes, "A great tree is only as good as its branches," and it is very beneficial for the weak to hide in the shadows of the strong for their own safety.
But in exchange for that security, they must dedicate their "Swiss identity" to the powerful, and have it engraved in their souls that they must serve the power for the rest of their lives.
You must understand that this curse is not just a sacrifice for you who are voting now, but will continue for your children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren for eternity.
Yes, today all the pro-war propagandists only talk to themselves and have na(r)cissistic wet dreams about seeing themselves in the media again later (maybe they even record it and play it over and over at home).
> that war crimes only seem to matter when they’re committed against white Europeans—or by opponents of Western imperialism.
That first clause is absolute garbage, and you should take it out. Only the second case is true, and you know it yourself not only from recent precedents but from your entire lifetime, Pascal.
It's actually quite shameful that you would even write the first one.
What is your point of debate, did the clause hurt your feelings? The truth generally hurts. "War crimes only matter when it's against White Europeans" Why else was resistance to colonialism framed as terrorism? Why else when natives defend their homes against White invaders they are labelled insurgents? Or why is it Western soldiers are considered hostages and not POWs? I guess the hypocrisy needs defending with emotions and meaningless slogans such as peace, democrazy and freedumb.
3. I completely agree with the evil hypocrisy that you gave examples, especially the hostages/prisoners example
4. So long as Jews get to pick and choose when they want to categorise themselves as 'huwhite' when it suits them, I don't count them as such
5. I seem to remember a terrific amount of coverage of Darfur when all sorts of war crimes and genocidal ethnic cleansing were happening, as well as a completely one-sided narrative about Yugoslavia, an equally one-sided narrative about Ukraine currently happening... there isn't a "white vs. nonwhite" situation in any of those...
There is an attempt to create a racial struggle, but as is, there is not a white versus nonwhite struggle. What there exists is system that creates the mindset of superiority. With us all being human but some more human than others. There in lay the challenge as if humans can dehumanise other humans then genocide is possible. The Ukrainian conflict happening at the same time as the Gaza genocide demonstrates the hypocrisy clearly. As Russia is condemned for the "allegations" of genocide while what is happening in Gaza, is armed and given full western support to commit actual genocide. Why is that so? Why are Ukrainians labelled beautiful people while preteens being targeted by snipers in Gaza is not even news? Isn't the right given to the European colonists in the ME to label everyone around them as terrorists not a sign of some privilege? While at the same time bombing hospitals, ambulances, schools, mosques, churches, people in tents etc. While also raping and debating in the kineset the right to rape and kill people they consider not human a privilege for a special kind of people?
Yes, of course, and once again, I agree with everything you have said. But I go back to my point: ALL of that is attributable to the second clause, and what you described does not meet the first. Jews are Jews, they aren't "White Europeans", despite the Ashkenazi DNA sequencing showing their ancestry isn't Levantine, and genetic testing which I've heard is banned in Israel.
No matter how much people want to cope about it, they are and always will be a distinct group who have made themselves deliberately distinct and separate (and superior) for thousands of years. When someone uses the term White European, no Jew thinks of themselves, they think someone is referring to the European goyim.
And I'm not suggesting that nowhere in history or the present day do 'White Europeans' not also have a sense of superiority... but here's the reality check for you: *every group thinks that way about themselves*
6. So-called "white Europeans" in Europe don't really regard Slavs as being the same as them. They don't even regard Czechs or Poles as the same as them, and despite the inane delusions of the EU none of the member states or ethnic groups regard themselves as the same as each other deep down, which is completely fine and normal.
Dear Swiss Citizens
The root you should consider is, "Am I Swiss or European?".
As painful as it sounds, Switzerland is a small country with a total population of only about 9 million people.
As the saying goes, "A great tree is only as good as its branches," and it is very beneficial for the weak to hide in the shadows of the strong for their own safety.
But in exchange for that security, they must dedicate their "Swiss identity" to the powerful, and have it engraved in their souls that they must serve the power for the rest of their lives.
You must understand that this curse is not just a sacrifice for you who are voting now, but will continue for your children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren for eternity.
Yes, today all the pro-war propagandists only talk to themselves and have na(r)cissistic wet dreams about seeing themselves in the media again later (maybe they even record it and play it over and over at home).
Swiss neutrality ended on the 10th of September 2002 when they joined the United Nations.
Swiss neutrality was always bullshit.
> that war crimes only seem to matter when they’re committed against white Europeans—or by opponents of Western imperialism.
That first clause is absolute garbage, and you should take it out. Only the second case is true, and you know it yourself not only from recent precedents but from your entire lifetime, Pascal.
It's actually quite shameful that you would even write the first one.
What is your point of debate, did the clause hurt your feelings? The truth generally hurts. "War crimes only matter when it's against White Europeans" Why else was resistance to colonialism framed as terrorism? Why else when natives defend their homes against White invaders they are labelled insurgents? Or why is it Western soldiers are considered hostages and not POWs? I guess the hypocrisy needs defending with emotions and meaningless slogans such as peace, democrazy and freedumb.
7. Most importantly the second clause explains and accounts for everything you have said.
1. I'm not American
2. I don't support Israel at all
3. I completely agree with the evil hypocrisy that you gave examples, especially the hostages/prisoners example
4. So long as Jews get to pick and choose when they want to categorise themselves as 'huwhite' when it suits them, I don't count them as such
5. I seem to remember a terrific amount of coverage of Darfur when all sorts of war crimes and genocidal ethnic cleansing were happening, as well as a completely one-sided narrative about Yugoslavia, an equally one-sided narrative about Ukraine currently happening... there isn't a "white vs. nonwhite" situation in any of those...
There is an attempt to create a racial struggle, but as is, there is not a white versus nonwhite struggle. What there exists is system that creates the mindset of superiority. With us all being human but some more human than others. There in lay the challenge as if humans can dehumanise other humans then genocide is possible. The Ukrainian conflict happening at the same time as the Gaza genocide demonstrates the hypocrisy clearly. As Russia is condemned for the "allegations" of genocide while what is happening in Gaza, is armed and given full western support to commit actual genocide. Why is that so? Why are Ukrainians labelled beautiful people while preteens being targeted by snipers in Gaza is not even news? Isn't the right given to the European colonists in the ME to label everyone around them as terrorists not a sign of some privilege? While at the same time bombing hospitals, ambulances, schools, mosques, churches, people in tents etc. While also raping and debating in the kineset the right to rape and kill people they consider not human a privilege for a special kind of people?
Yes, of course, and once again, I agree with everything you have said. But I go back to my point: ALL of that is attributable to the second clause, and what you described does not meet the first. Jews are Jews, they aren't "White Europeans", despite the Ashkenazi DNA sequencing showing their ancestry isn't Levantine, and genetic testing which I've heard is banned in Israel.
No matter how much people want to cope about it, they are and always will be a distinct group who have made themselves deliberately distinct and separate (and superior) for thousands of years. When someone uses the term White European, no Jew thinks of themselves, they think someone is referring to the European goyim.
And I'm not suggesting that nowhere in history or the present day do 'White Europeans' not also have a sense of superiority... but here's the reality check for you: *every group thinks that way about themselves*
6. So-called "white Europeans" in Europe don't really regard Slavs as being the same as them. They don't even regard Czechs or Poles as the same as them, and despite the inane delusions of the EU none of the member states or ethnic groups regard themselves as the same as each other deep down, which is completely fine and normal.